Architecture Validation
Evidence that an agent design is necessary, bounded, safe and better than a simpler baseline across quality, recovery, latency and cost.
Architecture validation tests the structure, not only a pleasant answer. It checks ambiguous requests, unavailable or contradictory tools, repeated actions, exhausted budgets, rejected approvals, restart recovery and cross-boundary access attempts.
Hard gates include deterministic control over permissions and side effects, least-privilege tools, durable state when required, and risk-based human approval. A release should compare quality, latency and cost with the simplest credible alternative.
Still curious?
Ask Kuni, your AI learning companion, to explain this concept in the context of your own work.
AI can make mistakes. Check important facts, decisions and sources before relying on them.
Ask PRISM
Ask SENTINEL
Ask ORION
Ask ExaminerSTART
Bounded roles
CONTROL
Visible hand-offs
OUTCOME
Human owner
AGENTS & WORKFLOWS
Go deeper
Related concepts
Seen in cases
Real-world examples where this concept appears in our case studies.
Ready to bring AI into your organization?
Talk to us about a guided adoption path for your team — from first use case to production.
Ask about this concept